Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 109% (2520MHz vs 1203MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada +3670%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
1024
576
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
Unknown
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GM206S
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
950 OEM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy