CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
NVIDIA TITAN Ada
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+1521%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
VS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
144
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
18432
Shading Units
2304
576
TMUs
144
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Ellesmere
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Board Design
800W
TDP
250W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA NVS 810
2
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI Radeon HD 4520
3
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon 550
4
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
5
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI Radeon HD 4850
6
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q
7
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI Radeon HD 5730
8
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
9
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
10
NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon HD 7970
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy