Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (1770MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN RTX +1613%
16.31 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2018
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 20
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
512
288
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

280W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy