NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1590MHz vs 1531MHz)
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+285%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
14
3584
Shading Units
896
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
TU116
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
