NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1531MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+500%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GM206
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
