Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R7 250

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +1429%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 10
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy