Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs Intel H3C XG310

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2020
Voodoo4-2
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
2
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
DG1
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
-
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
180 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
Unknown
112 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy