Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 6290

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 250 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Radeon HD 6290 Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250 +272%
387
Radeon HD 6290
104
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Cedar
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy