Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs FireStream 9170

GeForce GTS 450 vs FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
FireStream 9170 Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 +20%
601
FireStream 9170
497
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
RV670
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)

4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy