Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +374%
2849
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
TU106
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy