Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs GRID M60 4A

Quadro K1200 vs GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
GRID M60 4A Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1178MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
GRID M60 4A +319%
4825
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM204
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy