Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro K4200

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1124MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 108W)
Quadro K4200 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro K4200 +83%
2107
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro K4200 +102%
178
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
108W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy