Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro NVS 290

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 290 Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +3868%
1151
Quadro NVS 290
29
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
21W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G86
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy