Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Quadro P3000 Mobile Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1215MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro P3000 Mobile +170%
3110
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro P3000 Mobile +209%
272
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1088 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy