Home Comparison AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 73F3 with 16 cores 3.5GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 73F3 's Advantages
Released 120 years and 2 months late
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 240W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 73F3
501
Centaur CHA +56%
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 73F3
2348
Centaur CHA +69%
3982
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2021
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Milan
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

33.2 billions
Transistor Count
-
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
240 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x81 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
12 nm
I/O Process Size
-
416 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 KB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
Cores per CCD
-
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
8
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy