Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9255 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q

AMD EPYC 9255 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9255 with 24 cores 3.25GHz and Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q with 38 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9255 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.25GHz vs 2.6GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 57MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (200W vs 270W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Apr 2021
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Ice Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 4189
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Platinum (Ice Lake-SP)

Package

33.26 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
200 W
Power Consumption
270 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

24
Performance Cores
-
48
Performance Core Threads
-
3.25 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
24
Total Core Count
38
48
Total Thread Count
76
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32.5
Multiplier
26.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
57 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
8
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
4
128
PCIe Lanes
64

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy