AMD EPYC 9384X vs Opteron X2170
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz and Opteron X2170 with 4 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 28nm)
Opteron X2170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 320W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2023
Release Date
Sep 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Genoa-X
Core Architecture
Steppe Eagle
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket FT3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon R5E
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Opteron (X-Series)
Package
90.16 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
25 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
8x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
4
64
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.5
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
768 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
