Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7290 with 72 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)

Package

Transistor Count
8 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
245 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.7 GHz
144
Total Core Count
72
288
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
15.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy