Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Xeon E 2278GEL

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Xeon E 2278GEL

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Xeon E 2278GEL with 8 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Xeon E 2278GEL 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2019
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Coffee Lake-S WS
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 1151
N/A
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics P630
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)

Package

Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
35 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
180 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
144
Total Core Count
8
288
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
20.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy