AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Celeron N4020

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Intel Celeron N4020

We compared two laptop CPUs: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U with 8 cores 3.3GHz and Intel Celeron N4020 with 2 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 5 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)

Newer PCIe version (4 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 1.1GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron N4020 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (6W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U +298%

1807

Intel Celeron N4020

454

Geekbench 6 Single Core

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U +554%

2407

Intel Celeron N4020

368

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U +1501%

9320

Intel Celeron N4020

582

Blender

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U +8150%

165

Intel Celeron N4020

2

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

VS

Intel Celeron N4020

General Parameters

Apr 2024

Release Date

Nov 2019

AMD

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Hawk Point

Core Architecture

Gemini Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

N4020

AMD Socket FP7

Socket

BGA-1090

Radeon 780M

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 600

Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))

Generation

-

Package

25 billions

Transistor Count

-

4 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

28 W

Power Consumption

6 W

-

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

178 mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

2

-

Performance Core Threads

2

3.3 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.1 GHz

5.1 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

8

Total Core Count

2

16

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

33.0

Multiplier

-

64 KB per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

4 MB shared

16 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

-

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

-

Max Memory Bandwidth

38.4 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

650 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.14 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Official Website

Intel Celeron N4020

4

PCIe Version

2.0

20

PCIe Lanes

6

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core i7 10810U

2

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

3

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Apple M4 8 Cores

4

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

5

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Celeron N3350E

6

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core i7 8665U

7

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core i5 9400H

8

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core i9 14900HX

9

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

10

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core i7 1195G7

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market