Apple M3 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

VS

Apple M3 Pro

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

We compared two laptop CPUs: Apple M3 Pro with 12 cores 4.05GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS with 6 cores 3.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Apple M3 Pro 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4266)

Larger memory bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 68.27GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (4.05GHz vs 3.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)

Lower TDP (30W vs 54W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Apple M3 Pro +73%

1992

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

1151

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Apple M3 Pro +69%

15139

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

8931

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Apple M3 Pro +131%

3155

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

1365

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Apple M3 Pro +176%

15057

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

5454

Blender

Apple M3 Pro +127%

253

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

111

Passmark CPU Single Core

Apple M3 Pro +96%

4790

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

2441

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Apple M3 Pro +86%

26949

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

14481

Apple M3 Pro

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

General Parameters

Oct 2023

Release Date

Jan 2020

Apple

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

ARMv8

Instruction Set

x86-64

Apple M3

Core Architecture

Zen 2

Apple M-Socket

Socket

FP6

Apple M3 Pro GPU (19-core)

Integrated Graphics

Radeon RX Vega 6

Package

37 billions

Transistor Count

-

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

30 W

Power Consumption

35-54 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

6

Performance Core Threads

12

4.05 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.0 GHz

4.05 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

6

Efficiency Cores

-

6

Efficiency Core Threads

-

2.75 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

2.57 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

12

Total Core Count

6

12

Total Thread Count

12

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

40x

Multiplier

30x

192 K per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

16 MB shared

L2 Cache

512 K per core

-

L3 Cache

8 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266

36 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

3

Max Memory Channels

2

153.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

68.27 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

500 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1600 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1500 MHz

2304

Shader Units

384

144

Texture Units

24

72

Raster Operation Units

8

288

Execution Units

-

Power Consumption

15 W

7.4 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

4.0

PCIe Version

3.0

-

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Apple M3 Pro vs Intel Core i5 1035G7

2

Apple M3 Pro vs Intel Celeron N3060

3

Apple M3 Pro vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

4

Apple M3 Pro vs Intel Core 3 100U

5

Apple M3 Pro vs Apple M4 Max 16 Cores

6

Apple M3 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

7

Apple M3 Pro vs Intel Core i3 N305

8

Apple M3 Pro vs Intel Core i5 7300HQ

9

Apple M3 Pro vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

10

Apple M3 Pro vs Intel Core i5 7200U

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market