FirePro V3700 vs Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
64
Arc A380
+6459%
4198
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
