FireStream 9250 vs FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
FirePro W7000
+143%
2432
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
20
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
