FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 750 GM206
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
+26%
1269
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GM206
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
