FireStream 9250 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1100%
12000
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
