GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+723%
4416
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
536
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
27
1280
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT200
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
