GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon R9 295X2
+29%
5733
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Vesuvius
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
