GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 750 GM206
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
+112%
1269
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM206
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
