Home Comparison GeForce GTX 780 vs FireStream 9250

GeForce GTX 780 vs FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 +315%
4156
FireStream 9250
1000
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
2304
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
RV770
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy