GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2505MHz vs 2040MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+1455%
48740
Radeon PRO W6300
3133
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
768
304
TMUs
48
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Navi 24
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7