Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16 cores 3.7GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100 with 10 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 's Advantages

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4.0)

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 7467)

Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 5nm)

Lower TDP (23W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +27%

1908

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

1496

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +65%

20374

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

12347

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +12%

2665

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

2378

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +15%

15326

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

13297

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Sep 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Qualcomm

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

ARMv9

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Snapdragon X

285H

Processor Number

X1E-66-100

FCLGA-1851

Socket

Custom

Arc Graphics

Integrated Graphics

Qualcomm Adreno X1

Package

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

4 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

23 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

10

6

Performance Core Threads

10

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

5.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

10

Efficiency Cores

-

10

Efficiency Core Threads

-

0 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Total Core Count

10

16

Total Thread Count

10

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

37

Multiplier

34x

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

-

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5-7467,LPDDR5x-7467,DDR5-5600

Memory Types

LPDDR5X-8448

192 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

135 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

500 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

-

Shader Units

1536

-

Texture Units

48

-

Raster Operation Units

6

-

Execution Units

6

-

Graphics Performance

3.7 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P 66 100

5.0

PCIe Version

4.0

28

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Pentium N3700

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 12600H

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600U

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 13420H

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 10300H

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i7 10610U

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 395

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 8265U

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Apple M4 10 Cores

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market