Intel Processor 300 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

VS

Intel Processor 300

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Processor 300 with 2 cores 3.9GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX with 32 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Processor 300 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 3 months late

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4.0)

Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 3.5GHz)

Lower TDP (46W vs 280W)

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX 's Advantages

Larger memory bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)

Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 6MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Processor 300 +18%

1469

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

1244

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Processor 300

3981

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +991%

43450

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Processor 300 +85%

2998

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

1615

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Processor 300

6696

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +154%

17022

Intel Processor 300

VS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

General Parameters

Oct 2023

Release Date

Jul 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Zen 2

300

Processor Number

-

LGA-1700

Socket

sWRX8

UHD Graphics 730

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

46 W

Power Consumption

280 W

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

90 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

32

4

Performance Core Threads

64

3.9 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.5 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.2 GHz

2

Total Core Count

32

4

Total Thread Count

64

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

39x

Multiplier

35x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

6 MB shared

L3 Cache

128 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

128 GB

Max Memory Size

2048 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

204.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1400 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

192

Shader Units

-

48

Texture Units

-

24

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

5.0

PCIe Version

4.0

20

PCIe Lanes

128

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Pentium G4400

2

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i7 13700

3

Intel Processor 300 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

4

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i9 7920X

5

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5420

6

Intel Processor 300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

7

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i7 10700F

8

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i7 12700F

9

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i7 7800X

10

Intel Processor 300 vs Intel Core i5 12500T

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market