Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3335 vs AMD EPYC 9654

Intel Xeon W 3335 vs AMD EPYC 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
1351
AMD EPYC 9654 +46%
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3335
10557
AMD EPYC 9654 +88%
19940
Blender
Intel Xeon W 3335
340
AMD EPYC 9654 +687%
2678
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
250 W
Power Consumption
360 W
78 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
16
Total Core Count
96
32
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy