Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Centaur CHA

Intel Xeon W 3335 vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3335 with 16 cores 3.4GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3335 's Advantages
Released 120 years and 6 months late
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 16MB)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3335 +71%
1351
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3335 +165%
10557
Centaur CHA
3982
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Jan 1901
Intel
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
CHA
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
250 W
Power Consumption
70 W
78 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
195 mm²
FC-LGA4189
Package
FC-LGA2084

CPU Performance

3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
8
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
3
64
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy