Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1650MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+17%
2534
Radeon E9260 MXM
2150
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Sep 2016
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
