Home Comparison Opteron X2 170 vs AMD EPYC 9384X

Opteron X2 170 vs AMD EPYC 9384X

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron X2 170 with 2 cores 2GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron X2 170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2005
Release Date
Jun 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Denmark
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
AMD Socket 939
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

0.233 billions
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
110 W
Power Consumption
320 W
65 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
199 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
2
Total Core Count
32
2
Total Thread Count
64
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
25.5
128 KB
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy