Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 350W)
Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Arctic Sound 1T
+2293%
11060
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
96
192 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
350W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
