Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro P520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro P520 Mobile
+148%
1147
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1303 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
3
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GP108
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
