Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140

Quadro M2000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1950MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +123%
3994
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy