Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 4000

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1545MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro RTX 4000 +298%
7119
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
TU104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy