Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P6000

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1645MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro P6000 +607%
12630
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro P6000 +468%
825
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro P6000 +535%
178
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
3840
48
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy