Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

Quadro M2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Intel Arctic Sound M +725%
14750
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

768
Shading Units
8192
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
DG2-512
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy