Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

Quadro M2000 vs Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +39%
1786
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA10B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy