Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P1000

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1480MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro P1000 +6%
1894
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro P1000 +6%
155
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro P1000 +14%
32
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy