Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

Quadro M2000 vs Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB +5%
1880
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.69 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.38 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.760 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.880 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
940.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA10B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
TE980M-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy