Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P400

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1252MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +178%
1786
Quadro P400
641
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000 +211%
28
Quadro P400
9
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
256
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy