Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro GP100

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1442MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro GP100 +478%
10340
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro GP100 +757%
240
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1304 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP100
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy