Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro NVS 160M

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +7665%
1786
Quadro NVS 160M
23
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
8
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G98
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy