Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1291MHz vs 1163MHz)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
Quadro P2000 Mobile +66%
2974
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro P2000 Mobile +59%
231
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
28
Quadro P2000 Mobile +92%
54
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
1152
48
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP106
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy