Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P520 Mobile

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1493MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +55%
1786
Quadro P520 Mobile
1147
Blender
Quadro M2000 +95%
145
Quadro P520 Mobile
74
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000 +47%
28
Quadro P520 Mobile
19
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP108
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy